Saturday, December 11, 2010

What Is An Emu Bronte Boot And An Emu Stinger

Climate Summit 2010: Success a la Cancun

The fact that the international climate change negotiations in Cancun, Mexico, in fact, no success has been surprising, probably no one. What surprised me very well and disgusts, the flower girl in policy and expertise, the scatter of the conference roses. Of course applaud himself, the participants of this "climate summit", at the end itself Who's going with "zero expectations" in such negotiations can of course speak of a success if he signed anything.

what you signed? Nothing. The commitments that we take the necessity of certain measures of knowledge and it will negotiate again, although the details still do not know how they do it and who will contribute how much. Cancun failed - and even then in Kyoto. Expert Prof. Stefan Schleicher, who spoke at today Ă–1 about (what there and can simultaneously hear them as online), but is encouraged by the results and provides a new treaty for building more agreements, but I guess this is called diplomacy - and what is diplomacy, which has been shown before Causa to WikiLeaks recently: the undermining of the truth .

Schleicher was already "Kyoto" for hope and he is right, if he remains with his eyes on the paper. But what one diplomat called the loss of common consensus, the truth is that the largest LPG producer China, never really thought of "Kyoto", although it signed the mop, and now that the second-largest U.S. dirty, Kyoto at all not ratified - and since Kyoto was on any other "climate summit" brought nothing.

course, could object to, as were results should in any case that the issue of climate change, through such summit would get international attention. But this argument is only for politicians, for the rest of us world citizens, informed on a regular basis through the media and the Internet, on the subject. When scientists warn / inside for decades from the effects of including the industrial CO2 emissions, one needs not only an international climate summit to arrange for the Foreign Minister inside this world, to the Topic to not take seriously enough.

One result would be if those in charge up there, finally translated effective measures that would end the kindergarten, in which one is not to be restricted, so long as the other so that does not begin. A result in the sense of the matter is based not only on a few signed papers on which are commitments to action, their concrete implementation remains left out, and even if there were concrete actions, it is none of a breach of contract could be punished. But rules that are not executed are no rules. The only result that should count is a de facto reduction of greenhouse emissions worldwide - no matter how much the international policy itself beweihräuchert (presumably with their Kyoto-defined CO2 surpluses).

It is only when emissions will actually determine the science then a positive effect on the global climate system, may be called a success, everything else belongs to the pitiful imagination of the bureaucrats, diplomats and is of real people, not value - as this summit in Cancun. Another Spesenmoloch for each tax payer / inside. The only people who contributed something to this conference, were the interpreters and the cleaning and catering staff - perhaps should the next summit guide. Ultimately, he showed that a positive change, yet again, not by the elected or dictatorial representatives can run out of people, but only from below, by the people themselves, the rulers / inside and Regent / fail from all political systems, it time that not only the workers, unite all men's and women's country, but humanity, corruption-free under a representative. Ultimately, only freedom from corruption will lead to near-zero emissions freedom.

0 comments:

Post a Comment